Hack Your Knowledge
Recent blog posts
- Adding a Tab - disable this feature
- Cleaning entered username at login
- Cross platform migration
- Banner SSB Channels
- Alternative for inline frame channels?
- Luminis channel errors
- Facebook Channel - Non-Portlet
- AppServer Installation Errors
- Luminis 3.3 to 4 Migration properties questions/thoughts...
- Proxy Settings on Luminis
Developer Links
Poll
What version of Luminis are you on (Production)?
Luminis III.3.3.x
50%
Luminis 4.0.x
24%
Luminis 4.1.0.x
20%
Luminis 4.x
5%
Luminis 5+
0%
NONE : We ditched Luminis for static HTML! (it was more functional and doesn't crash)
1%
Total votes: 104
Syndicate
I was looking at the product
I was looking at the product page, it looks cool, but I doubt it supports the iChannel framework. Also it did not say anythin about JSR168. Now I could be wrong about this, but I believe that in the new Luminis/uPortal, there is an iChannel Framework emulator that runs in a JSR168 Portlet that makes channels backward compatible. Now I'm likely wrong on this but its something to look into. If thats the case you may be able to run iChannel based channels on any portal supporting JSR168. *again just a theory...
This looked interesting in the LifeRay spec sheet: Parallel (Asynchronous) Portlet Rendering Engine
Thanks for the input
Thanks for the input. I was not at Summit this year, but last year I recall one of the presenters saying that since Luminis Channels are JSR-168 compliant, then "theoretically" they should be able to be consumed by LifeRay. I am curious about all this because we are currently evaluating Spring/Mule/LifeRay. We are looking for a solution which could consume our existing Services, Luminis Channels, and any other third party services we so desire.